“Web 2.0 is the network as platform, spanning all connected devices; Web 2.0 applications are those that make the most of the intrinsic advantages of that platform: delivering software as a continually-updated service that gets better the more people use it, consuming and remixing data from multiple sources, including individual users, while providing their own data and services in a form that allows remixing by others, creating network effects through an ‘architecture of participation,’ and going beyond the page metaphor of Web 1.0 to deliver rich user experiences.”

I got all interested when I heard friends discussing web 2.0, so I swiftly went and read that definition. After reading it a few times, I understood it, too. But — okay, is that even a sentence? A sentence is a verbal construction meant to express a complete thought. This congelation that Tim O’Reilly constructed, that is not a complete thought. It’s a network in permanent beta.

✖ Via Beyond the Beyond: “What Bruce Sterling Actually Said About Web 2.0 at Webstock 09” by Bruce Sterling (March 1, 2009).

Learn more at the Webstock09 site. Watch the video of the conference on Vimeo.



• Jun 29, 2009 link notes tagged: technology  internet  communication  author  web 2.0 

skandalon


1 2



APHELIS / ARCHIVE / RSS / CONTACT / Theme based on D&D