We are troubled on every side, yet not distressed; we are perplexed but not in despair.
✖ Via Bible, 2 Corinthians 4:8:

As quoted in the third installment of Errol Morris’ essay on anosognosia (published in The New York Times). Part 3 is all about the debilitating stroke President Woodrow Wilson suffered on October 1919 and his subsequent refusal to acknowledge that there was something wrong with him. Morris tells the story:

For Levin, Wilson’s inability to perceive his own incapacity had truly devastating consequences for the nation and world he helped to lead. Perhaps even more troublingly, the reaction to Wilson’s anosognosia on the part of his close associates raises the possibility of an even more problematic impairment — a social anosognosia. Can a group of people, perhaps even society at large, devolve into a state of destructive cluelessness?

Wilson expressed it best of all. On hearing the news of the Senate vote — essentially, the end of the League fight — Wilson asked Grayson to read a verse from the Bible, 2 Corinthians 4:8:
We are troubled on every side, yet not distressed; we are perplexed but not in despair.
Wilson then said, “If I were not a Christian, I think I should go mad, but my faith in God holds me to the belief that He is in some way working out his plan through human perversity and mistakes.”[52]

Amen. (more)


• Jun 28, 2010 link notes tagged: communication  cognitive bias  cognition  anosognosia  knowledge  consciousness  society  critic  despair  anxiety  history  self  pathology  incapacity  representation  collective  social  community 

Le désespoir est une forme supérieure de la critique
✖ Via “La Solitude”, Léo Ferré, 1971

Complete lyrics here. Take the time to listen to the full song on YouTube.

See also Laurence Olivier’s Contre l’espoir comme tâche politique (2004)

I think Ferré’s sentence can be read literally : despair can be understand as a critical state of being.



• Jun 19, 2010 link notes tagged: art  song  singer  poet  lyrics  solitude  critic  despair 

To take a dose of LSD is all right, and you will have the experience of being more or less crazy, but this will make quite good sense because you know you took the dose of LSD. If, on the other hand, you took the LSD by accident, and then find yourself going crazy, not knowing how you got there, this is a terrifying and horrible experience. This is a much more serious and terrible experience, very different from the trip which you can enjoy if you know you took the LSD.
Now consider the difference between my generation and you who are under twenty-five. We all live in the same crazy universe whose hate, distrust, and hypocrisy relates back (especially at the international level)’ to the Fourteen Points and the Treaty of Versailles.
We older ones know how we got here. I can remember my father reading the Fourteen Points at the breakfast table and saying, “By golly, they’re going to give them a decent armistice, a decent peace,” or something of the kind. And I can remember, but I will not attempt to verbalize, the sort of thing he said when the Treaty of Versailles came out. It wasn’t printable. So I know more or less how we got here.
But from your point of view, we are absolutely crazy, and you don’t know what sort of historic event led to this craziness. “The fathers have eaten bitter fruit and the children’s teeth are set on edge.” It’s all very well for the fathers, they know what they ate. The children don’t know what was eaten.
✖ Via Steps to an Ecology of Mind by Gregory Bateson, University of Chicago Press, [1972]2000, p. 481 [Google books preview]

Think midle eastern wars, energy crisis, Europe financial crisis, unexplainable killing sprees and so forth.

Previously on Skandalon



• May 25, 2010 link notes tagged: communication  technology  media  ecology  cybernetic  deception  despair  lost  confusion  generation  history  context  politic  economy  energy  war  destruction  murder  killing spree 

A.C. emails to say that he has re-classified all his philosophy books in order of their significance to him. So at the moment the top place in the shelf goes to Sartre and the bottom to Locke. But all this could change as his life moves on. He has already had to promote Kierkegaard from the third to the second shelf following the breakdown of his second marriage.
✖ Via fuckyeahphilosophy: Listener email for BBC’s Thinking Allowed with Laurie Taylor.

• Sep 21, 2009 link notes reblogged from fuckyeahphilosophy  [via] tagged: communication  book  author  philosophy  library  lost  despair  love 

skandalon


1 2



ARCHIVE / TUMBLTAPE / RSS / CONTACT / Theme based on D&D