art technology illustration illustrator comic cartoon humor critic dog animal identity privacy facebook internet computer cyberspace
✖ Via Noise To Signal: “Your friend just sniffed you! Sniff back? (y/n)” by Rob Cottingham, May 17th, 2010

This cartoon is an updated look at my original Facebook dogs, who kicked off Noise to Signal as the first cartoon under that name. And they are, of course, a reference/homage to Peter Steiner‘s iconic New Yorker cartoon. (more)
About Noise To Signal:
Noise to Signal is Rob Cottingham‘s take on the social web, online living and all that goes with it. N2S (as it’s known affectionately to, well, me) has appeared on such sites as the Huffington Post, PC World and TreeHugger. (more)


• Aug 13, 2010 link notes tagged: art  technology  illustration  illustrator  comic  cartoon  humor  critic  dog  animal  identity  privacy  Facebook  Internet  computer  cyberspace 
art illustration illustrator comic cartoon humor dog animal technology critic internet identity privacy facebook
✖ Via The New Yorker: “On The Internet, Nobody Knows You’re A Dog” by Peter Steiner, July 5th, 1993

Read the Wikipedia entry about Steiner’s illustration for more info.



• Aug 12, 2010 link notes tagged: art  illustration  illustrator  comic  cartoon  humor  dog  animal  technology  critic  Internet  identity  privacy  Facebook 

I thought all these other people. I thought how did they get to be who they are. It’s banks and car parks. It’s airline tickets in their computers. It’s restaurants filled with people talking. It’s people signing the merchant copy. It’s people taking the merchant copy out of the leather folder and then signing it and separating the merchant copy from the customer copy and putting their credit card in their wallet. This alone could do it.
✖ Via Cosmopolis by Don DeLillo, New York: Scribner, 2003, p. 195

Previously on Skandalon: Cosmopolis, Don DeLillo



• Jul 25, 2010 link notes tagged: art  novel  book  author  DeLillo  Cosmopolis  consumption  customer  money  economy  credit  debt  identity  existence  reality  being 

The things that made him who he was could hardly be identified much less converted to data, the things that lived and milled in his body, everywhere, random, riotous, billions of trillions, in the neurons and peptides, the throbbing temple vein, in the veer of his libidinous intellect. So much come and gone, this is who he was, the lost taste of milk licked from his mother’s breast, the stuff he sneezes when he sneezes, this is him, and how a person becomes the reflections he sees in a dusty window when he walks by. He’d come to know himself, untranslatably, through his pain. He felt so tired now. His hard-gotten grip on the world, material things, great things, his memories true and false, the vague malaise of winter twilights, untransferable, the pale nights when his identity flattens for lack of sleep, the small wart he feels on his thigh every time he showers, all him, and how the soap he uses, the smell and feel of the concave bar make him who he is because he names the fragrance, amandine, and the hang of his cock, untransferable, and his strangely achy knee, the click in his knee when he bends it, all him, and so much else that’s not convertible to some high sublime, the technology of mind-without-end.
✖ Via Cosmopolis by Don DeLillo, New York: Scribner, 2003, p. 207-208

Let’s say for the moment that this quote relate to the general problem of the representation of the self: of the innumerable and diverse experiences I had, in my lifetime, how and under which conditions am I able to elaborate a stable representation of myself. Or, to put it in other words : How did I came up with a sense of my own identity?

Compare it with David Hume’s thoughts on mankind, Derrida’s view on the grammar of dreams (after Freud), who Pablo Neruda think he is (along with an excerpt from Paul Valery’s Mr. Teste), Quadrophenia, and finally the problem of translation from the perspective of media theorist Friedrich A. Kittler.

Previously on Skandalon: Don DeLillo



• Jun 18, 2010 link notes tagged: author  book  novel  art  technology  communication  translation  computer  machine  DeLillo  Cosmopolis  identity  self  network  event  effect  reality  life  subject  subjectivity  apparatus  node 

The identity of an individual is a product of human reason: it is not anything other than a rational self. Therefore, losing identity equals losing reason. So ‘communicative cognition’ is cognition as an event which occurs in a (critical) moment not controlled by reason. It belongs to the realm of affect which transcends reason or occurs due to the drive of affect. According to Bataille, the sense of an individual losing identity is also what characterizes communication with the other.
✖ Via Nami Ohi: “Cognition as Communication: The Accursed Share by Georges Bataille as a contribution to the study of Fundamental Informatics”, The New Trends of Socio-information in East Asia, Students’ workshop, at The University of Tokyo, Nov. 2007. [PDF]
“Nami Ohi is a doctoral student in the Graduate School of Interdisciplinary Information Studies (GSIIS), the University of Tokyo, supervised by Prof. Toru Nishigaki. She studies literature from the systems theory perspective. She is especially interested in haiku and analyzes it by using fundamental informatics as a theoretical framework.” (more)


• Jun 15, 2010 link notes tagged: communication  philosophy  lost  loser  individual  subjectivity  identity  representation  Bataille 

I have become an enigma to myself. So said Saint-Augustine. And herein lies my sickness.
✖ Via Cosmopolis by Don DeLillo, New York: Scribner, 2003, p. 189

The reference is Saint-Augustine’s Confessions, book X, chap. 33 (§50) :

“But do you hear me, O Lord, my God: look upon me and see, have mercy and heal me, for in your eyes I have become an enigma to myself, and herein lies my sickness.” (google books preview)

Previously on Skandalon: Cosmopolis, Don DeLillo



• Jun 13, 2010 link notes tagged: art,n  ovel  book  author  DeLillo  Cosmopolis  enigma  confusion  anxiety  identity  knowledge  self  becoming  Saint-Augustine 

We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.
✖ Via The Story of Philosophy: The Lives and Opinions of the World’s Greatest Philosophers by Will Durant, 1926, Ch. II: Aristotle and Greek Science; part VII: Ethics and the Nature of Happiness [Simon & Schuster/Pocket Books, 1991, p. 76]

The quote is MISATTRIBUTED to Aristotle:

“Excellence is an art won by training and habituation: we do not act rightly because we have virtue or excellence, but we rather have these because we have acted rightly; ‘these virtues are formed in man by his doing the actions’; we are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act but a habit: ‘the good of man is a working of the soul in the way of excellence in a complete life… for as it is not one swallow or one fine day that makes a spring, so it is not one day or a short time that makes a man blessed and happy’”.

The quoted phrases within the quotation are from the Nicomachean Ethics, Book II, 4; Book I, 7. The misattribution is from taking Durant’s summation of Aristotle’s ideas as being the words of Aristotle himself. (Wikiquote)

The Story of Philosophy by Will Durant on Google Books (no preview available) and on Amazon.

Spotted in Tumblr’s Radar. It was reblogged from Tomorrow Museum.



• May 26, 2010 link notes tagged: philosophy  self  identity  action  repetition  Aristotle  book  author 

Film-makers have got better and better at constructing shots so that their lengths grab our attention,” says James Cutting, a psychologist at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York. He analysed 150 Hollywood movies and found that the more recent they were, the more closely their shot lengths tended to follow a mathematical pattern that also describes human attention spans.
✖ Via New Scientist: “Solved: The mathematics of the Hollywood blockbuster” by Ewen Callaway, Feb. 18, 2010

Professional website of James Cutting, author of the study. Full PDF of the study (James E. Cutting, Jordan E. DeLong and Christine E. Nothelfer, “Attention and the Evolution of Hollywood Film” Psychological Science, XX(X) 1-8, published online on Feb 5, 2010).

Interesting study (it’s far from being the first scientific attempt at explaining box office success), VERY BAD TITLE from the New Scientist. Nothing was “solved”, for at least two reasons.

1) Some common aspects were observed in 150 movies, after the fact. Therefore, the study could have the value of a good but limited deduction. Its inductive and predictive potential still needs to be demonstrated.

2) More importantly, one won’t be able to find any satisfactory description of what a “blockbuster” is in this study. In fact, there isn’t any mention of the word “blockbuster” in it. Instead, one will notice a normative effort to classify a number a films according to a certain number of criteria :

“We chose 150 films, 10 released in each of 15 years, every 5 years from 1935 to 2005. The Supplemental Material available on-line provides the complete list. Assembled from information in several on-line databases, the films from 1980 onward were among the highest grossing of their year and the earlier films were among those with the largest number of viewer ratings on the Internet Movie Database (IMDb; http://us.imdb.com). The films were also chosen, as best we could, to represent five genres—action, adventure, animation, comedy, and drama— although their distribution could not be uniform because of vagaries in Hollywood production and changes in social milieu and viewers’ taste. Genres were defined by the first-designated category for each film on the IMDb.”

Same problem with the title Neatorama chose for the post they published about the story : “The Code for Making Hollywood Blockbusters”. But Neatorama is no weekley international science magazine



• Feb 21, 2010 link notes reblogged from austinkleon  [via] tagged: art  communication  film  movie  blockbuster  science  critic  mathematic  study  identity 
derrida brain code communication difference dreams grammar movie philosophy poster psychoanalysis translation identity representation
✖ Via Internet Movie Poster Awards: Paprika by Satoshi Kon, 2006
“The dreamer invents his own grammar. No meaningful material or prior text exists which he might simply use, even if he never deprives himself of them. Such is, despite their interest, the limitation of the Chiffriermethode and the Traumbuch. As much as of the generality and the rigidity of the code, that limitation is a function of an excessive preoccupation with contents, an insufficient concern for relations, locations, processes, and differences (…)”

Quoted from “Freud and the scene of writing” by Jacques Derrida ([1966]1972), tr. by Jeffrey Mehlman, Yale French Studies, no 48, p. 89 (PDF available upon subscription to JSTOR).

Previously on Skandalon : Freud



• Feb 02, 2010 link notes  [via] tagged: Derrida  brain  code  communication  difference  dreams  grammar  movie  philosophy  poster  psychoanalysis  translation  identity  representation 

Of the many men whom I am, whom we are,
I cannot settle on a single one.
They are lost to me under the cover of clothing
They have departed for another city.

When everything seems to be set
to show me off as a man of intelligence,
the fool I keep concealed on my person
takes over my talk and occupies my mouth.

On other occasions, I am dozing in the midst
of people of some distinction,
and when I summon my courageous self,
a coward completely unknown to me
swaddles my poor skeleton
in a thousand tiny reservations.

When a stately home bursts into flames,
instead of the fireman I summon,
an arsonist bursts on the scene,
and he is I. There is nothing I can do.
What must I do to distinguish myself?
How can I put myself together?

All the books I read
lionize dazzling hero figures,
brimming with self-assurance.
I die with envy of them;
and, in films where bullets fly on the wind,
I am left in envy of the cowboys,
left admiring even the horses.

But when I call upon my dashing being,
out comes the same old lazy self,
and so I never know just who I am,
nor how many I am, nor who we will be being.
I would like to be able to touch a bell
and call up my real self, the truly me,
because if I really need my proper self,
I must not allow myself to disappear.

While I am writing, I am far away;
and when I come back, I have already left.
I should like to see if the same thing happens
to other people as it does to me,
to see if as many people are as I am,
and if they seem the same way to themselves.
When this problem has been thoroughly explored,
I am going to school myself so well in things
that, when I try to explain my problems,
I shall speak, not of self, but of geography.

✖ Via “We Are Many” by Pablo Neruda, in We Are Many (poems), translated by Alastair Reid, Cape Goliard Press, 1967, Grossman (New York, NY), 1968.

More of Neruda’s poems online over at PoemHunter.com

Compare with An Evening With Mr. Teste by Paul Valery (French poet, essayist and philosopher):

“Stupidity is not my strong point. I have seen many persons; I have visited several nation; I have taken part in divers enterprises without affecting them; I have eaten nearly everyday; I have tampered with women. I now recall several hundred faces, two or three great events, and perhaps the substance of twenty books. I have not retained the best nor the worst of these things. What could stick, did.
This bit of arithmetic spares me surprise at getting old. I could also add up the victorious moments of my mind, and imagine them joined and soldered, composing a happy life… But I think I have always been a good judge of myself. I have rarely lost sight of myself; I have detested, and adored myself―and so, we have grown old together.

(from the Selected Writings of Paul Valery, tr. byJackson Mathews, New Directions Publishing, 1964, p. 236)

See also The Who’s album Quadrophenia



• Jan 24, 2010 link notes tagged: art  experience  identity  individu  individuation  life  philosophy  poem  poet  self  subject  representation 
art artist cartoon identity snow uniqueness winter peanuts
✖ Via Comics.com: Peanuts by Charles M. Schulz (Original publish date Jan 6, 1963) [more]

Previously on Skandalon: The most popular snowflake in the world, Snow Crystal by Wilson Bentley.



• Jan 10, 2010 link notes tagged: art  artist  cartoon  identity  snow  uniqueness  winter  Peanuts 

I got four heads inside my mind
Four rooms I’d like to lie in
Four selves I want to find
And I don’t know which one is me
✖ Via Quadrophenia, Franc Roddam, 1979.

Listen to the song on YouTube. Read more about The Who’s album Quadrophenia.



• Jul 25, 2009 link notes tagged: song  singer  art  movie  film  opera  music  identity  lost  fragment 

But setting aside some metaphysicians of this kind, I may venture to affirm of the rest of mankind, that they are nothing but a bundle or collection of different perceptions, which succeed each other with an inconceivable rapidity, and are in a perpetual flux and movement.
✖ Via A Treatise of Human Nature, David Hume, I, 4, iv, §4.

• Mar 09, 2009 link notes  [via] tagged: book  philosophy  writer  identity  self  network  event  life  representation 

skandalon


1 2



ARCHIVE / TUMBLTAPE / RSS / CONTACT / Theme based on D&D