 | In June, Afghanistan officially outpaced Vietnam as the longest war in American history – and Obama has quietly begun to back away from the deadline he set for withdrawing U.S. troops in July of next year. The president finds himself stuck in something even more insane than a quagmire: a quagmire he knowingly walked into, even though it’s precisely the kind of gigantic, mind-numbing, multigenerational nation-building project he explicitly said he didn’t want. |
✖ Via Rolling Stone: “The Runaway General” by Michael Hastings, June 25th, 2010“The horror….the horror” A well-worth reading article by 30 years old journalist Michael Hastings. For me, it’s less about taking side (either for the Obama administration of for McChrystal strategy and ideas) than about the complex difficulties surrounding any large scale war operations. It’s somehow reminescent of McNamara’ account of what he called “The Fog of War” in Errol Morris’ documentary of the same name (2003). Anybody who ever saw Coppola’s Apocalypse Now will likely remember the extensive use of smoke and fog and the effect it has on the rendition of the story. Newsweek as an short interview with Michael Hastings explaining how the Rolling Stone’s piece was written. |
• Jun 28, 2010 link notes tagged:
Afghanistan
Apocalypse
United-States
art
communication
confusion
destruction
fog
history
horror
journalism
war
McChrystal
 | We go through life mishearing and misseeing and misunderstanding so that the stories we tell ourselves will add up. Trial lawyers push this human tendency to a higher level. They are playing for higher stakes than we are playing for when we tinker with actuality in order to transform the tale told by an idiot into an orderly, self-serving narrative. |
✖ Via The New Yorker: “Iphigenia in Forest Hill” by Janet Malcolm, May 3rd, 2010, p. 38 An excerpt taken from the fascinating (really) account of Mazoltuv Borukhova’s Trial. The way Malcolm’s puts it could be used, I think, to illustrate the existential implication of “cognitive dissonance”. Janet Malcolm : “(born 1934) is an American writer and journalist on staff at The New Yorker magazine. She is the author of Psychoanalysis: The Impossible Profession (1981), In the Freud Archives (1984) and The Journalist and the Murderer (1990).” (wikipedia) |
• May 10, 2010 link notes tagged:
art
technology
communication
life
existence
order
chaos
narrative
representation
lost
loser
trial
law
cognition
cognitive dissonance
journalism
 | The plea bargain is the moment when the case pivoted from the story of what Polanski did to Samantha Gailey to the story of what the system did to him. Polanski’s detractors focus on the first, his supporters on the second, but the two are interwined, and both were shaped by the influence of Polanski celebrity. |
✖ Via The New Yorker: “The Celebrity Defense. Sax, fame and the case of Roman Polanski” by Jeffrey Toobin, Dec. 14, 2009, p. 57 Excellent article on the subject : Toobin makes an explicite effort to restrain himself to the presentation of hard (legal) facts. Jeffrey Toobin is a staff writer to The New Yorker. He is also “the author of five books, including The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court, which won the 2008 J. Anthony Lukas Book Prize” (TNY). Check his official website. |
• Feb 26, 2010 link notes tagged:
journalism
celebrity
film
filmmaker
law
justice
United-States
culture
sex
girls
 | The internet may kill newspapers; but it is not clear if that matters. For society, what matters is that people should have access to news, not that it should be delivered through any particular medium; and, for the consumer, the faster it travels, the better. The telegraph hastened the speed at which news was disseminated. So does the internet. Those in the news business use the new technology at every stage of newsgathering and distribution. A move to electronic distribution—through PCs, mobile phones and e-readers—has started. It seems likely only to accelerate. |
✖ Via The Economist: “Newspapers and technology: Network effects” Dec 17th, 2009 Interesting article overall. But the quotation above is problematic, for it could be argued that a change of medium would result in a change of message (right Marshall?). The anticipated disappearance of traditional newspapers should be studied (before being condemned or celebrated) as a global change in the means we use to shape our experience of the world and, thus, in the world itself. The news won’t be the same. Our experience of the news will change. |
• Jan 12, 2010 link notes [via] tagged:
communication
technology
history
evolution
newspaper
news
journalism
telegraph
twitter
Internet
speed
medium
media