 | Certes, le premier qui imagina de faire servir une gazette à ce que des êtres humains trouvent ce qu’ils cherchent, celui-là devrait avoir sa statue. Tout ce qui crée des rencontres mérite encouragement, même quand il s’agit de rencontre à fin sentimentale, et malgré tout ce qu’elles supposent de niaiserie et de médiocrité. |
✖ Via Henry de Montherlant, Les jeunes filles, éd. Gallimard, coll. Folio, Paris, 1936, p. 22. |
↳Shareskandalon
Sep 02 link notes
relation
social
novel
book
author
network
 | Hemingway had given the power to believe you could still shout down the corridor of the hospital, live next to the breath of the beast, accept your portion of dread each day. Now, the greatest living romantic was dead. Dread was loose. The giant had not paid his dues, and something awful was in the air. Technology would fill the pause. Into the silence, static would enter. It was conceivable that man was no longer ready to share the dread of the Lord. |
✖ Via Norman Mailer, Of A Fire On The Moon, Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1969, p. 4. Mailer underlines the fact that “John F. Kennedy had made his declaration concerning the moon not six weeks before Hemingway was dead”. |
↳Shareskandalon
Aug 09 link notes
technology
novel
author
moon
space
America
history
 | PLAYBOY: What do you think we’ll find on the moon?
STANLEY KUBRICK: I think the most exciting prospect about the moon is that if alien races have ever visited earth in the remote past and left artifacts for man to discover in the future, they probably chose the arid, airless lunar vacuum, where no deterioration would take place and an object could exist for millennia. It would be inevitable that as man evolved technologically, he would reach his nearest satellite and the aliens would then expect him to find their calling card—perhaps a message of greeting, a cache of knowledge or simply a cosmic burglar alarm signaling that another race had mastered space flight. This, of course, was the central situation of 2001. |
✖ Via Playboy: Director Stanley Kubrick interviewed by Eric Nordern for Playboy Magazine, September 1968. Full article available online. “To discover what has made Kubrick so respected—and controversial—a director, and to plumb both his own complexities and those of 2001, Playboy interviewed Kubrick at his elegant mansion outside London, a short drive from MGM’s studio at Borham Wood, where he is working on his latest film—a biography of Napoleon. Interviewer Eric Norden found Kubrick—”a slim, relaxed man with thinning hair, dark beard and intense eyes”—sprawled in a chair on the spacious expanse of lawn overlooking his elegantly tended gardens. “As Kubrick crossed one scuffed shoe over a wrinkled pants leg,” writes Norden, “I began by asking him to decipher the metaphysical message of 2001. Though his answer was enigmatically evasive, he was far more voluble about his space odyssey, and the destiny it prophesies for the human race, than about himself as man or moviemaker. It may be that he feels his private life is too dull to talk about, or perhaps too interesting, or simply nobody’s business but his own. But I think it’s more likely that he is one of those rare men whose self-concern is plural and impersonal, to whom the present is less real than the possible, who live less in the world of tangible reality than in the uncharted country of the mind.”” (read more)
I first came to know the existence of this interview through Sister Of The Raging Sea. |
↳Shareskandalon
Jul 29 link notes
art
technology
communication
film
movie
filmmaker
Moon
science fiction
novel
future
culture
America
celebrity
 | Cela se paie, le bonheur de ne pas aimer les médiocres. Et aimer des médiocres se paie par la médiocrité du bonheur qu’on y goûte. |
✖ Via Henry de Montherlant, Les jeunes filles, éd. Gallimard, coll. Folio, Paris, 1936, p. 34. |
↳Shareskandalon
Jul 10 link notes
book
novel
author
happiness
 | Le repliement sur soi-même n’est bon qu’aux natures singulières et fortes, et encore, à condition d’être relatif et entrecoupé. Les autres le payent cher. On ne s’enferme pas dans sa chambre impunément. On ne vit pas sur soi seul impunément. On «n’envoie pas coucher» impunément ses semblables. Et cela est bien ainsi, puisque le repliement sur soi-même – quand il n’est pas commandé par de hautes raisons intellectuelles ou spirituelles – n’a le plus souvent pour cause que la paresse, l’égoïsme, l’impuissance, bref, cette «peur de vivre» dont on n’a pas assez dit quelle place elle occupe parmi les maux qui désolent l’humanité. |
✖ Via Henry de Montherlant, Les jeunes filles, éd. Gallimard, coll. Folio, Paris, 1936, p. 22. |
↳Shareskandalon
Jul 09 link notes
alone
loneliness
humanity
society
book
author
novel