 |
It is not good for him who makes the laws to execute them, or for the body of the people to turn its attention away from a general standpoint and devote it to particular objects. Nothing is more dangerous than the influence of private interests in public affairs, and the abuse of the laws by the government is a less evil than the corruption of the legislator, which is the inevitable sequel to a particular standpoint. In such a case, the State being altered in substance, all reformation becomes impossible, A people that would never misuse governmental powers would never misuse independence; a people that would always govern well would not need to be governed.
If we take the term in the strict sense, there never has been a real democracy, and there never will be. |
✖ Via The Social Contract, Or Principles of Political Right by Jean-Jacques Rousseau, tr. by G. D. H. Cole, public domain (original publication : Amesterdam, 1792), Book III, chap 4. Here’s the original French text: Il n’est pas bon que celui qui fait les lois les exécute, ni que le corps du peuple détourne son attention des vues générales pour les donner aux objets particuliers. Rien n’est plus dangereux que l’influence des intérêts privés dans les affaires publiques, et l’abus des lois par le gouvernement est un mal moindre que la corruption du législateur, suite infaillible des vues particulières. Alors, l’État étant altéré dans sa substance, toute réforme devient impossible. Un peuple qui n’abuserait jamais du gouvernement n’abuserait pas non plus de l’indépendance; un peuple qui gouvernerait toujours bien n’aurait pas besoin d’être gouverné.
A prendre le terme dans la rigueur de l’acception, il n’a jamais existé de véritable démocratie, et il n’en existera jamais. (Du contrat social ou Principes du droit politique, Livre III, chap. 4) |
• Jul 29, 2010 link notes tagged:
politic
author
book
society
community
contract
government
law
democracy
Rousseau
state
power
 | Iran has summoned the Canadian charge d’affaires to the foreign ministry to condemn human rights violations by Canadian riot police against G20 protesters. The Canadian envoy was summoned to the ministry on Wednesday to receive Iran’s protest over the “violent and inhuman” treatment and the massive arrests of G20 protesters by the country’s riot police. Voicing concern over human rights abuse by the Canadian police, the Iranian representative reminded Canada of its international commitments to allow peaceful demonstrations and called on the government to respect the rights of detainees. |
✖ Via PressTV: “Iran slams Canada over G20 brutality” July 14th, 2010 About PressTV and its “vision” : Press TV takes revolutionary steps as the first Iranian international news network, broadcasting in English on a round-the-clock basis.
Heeding the often neglected voices and perspectives of a great portion of the world;
Embracing and building bridges of cultural understanding;
Encouraging human beings of different nationalities, races and creeds to identify with one another;
Bringing to light untold and overlooked stories of individuals who have experienced the vitality and versatility of political and cultural divides firsthand. (more) |
• Jul 16, 2010 link notes tagged:
communication
politic
protest
human rights
violence
humor
Iran
Canada
demonstration
 |
There is nothing that man fears more than the touch of the unknown. He wants to see what is reaching towards him, and to be able to recognize or at least classify it. Man always tends to avoid physical contact with anything strange. In the dark, the fear of an unexpected touch can mount to panic. Even clothes give insufficient security: it is easy to tear them and pierce through to the naked, smooth, defenceless flesh of the victim.
All the distances which men create round themselves are dictated by this fear. They shut themselves in houses which noone may enter, and only there feel some measure of security. The fear of burglars is not only the fear of being robbed, but also the fear of a sudden and unexpected clutch out of the darkness. |
✖ Via Crowds and Power by Elias Canetti, tr. Carol Stewart, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, [1960]1962, p. 15 (originally published as Masse und Macht, Hamburg: Claassen Verlag, 1960) |
• Jul 13, 2010 link notes tagged:
communication
community
relation
touch
fear
together
politic
body
skin
society
panic
security
immunity
space
distance
protection
defense
aggresion
environment
crowd
mass
power
Canetti
 | So the community does you no damn good! |
✖ Via The New York Times: “The Anosognosic’s Dilemma: Something’s Wrong but You’ll Never Know What It Is (Part 5)” by Errol Morris, June 24th, 2010 Who ever said that community was supposed to do good things for you? Really? I’m aware that most of us think that way, but where is this idea coming from? And what about another idea : community is a problem, not a solution. Consider this: (…) what is meant by this word body politic, and how it signifieth not the concord, but the union of many men. We are together, yes, but not necessarily because we love or agree with each other. This quote is taken from the book Elements of Law by Thomas Hobbes, chap. 8, §7, 1650. |
• Jun 29, 2010 link notes tagged:
Esposito
beliefs
communication
communitas
community
humanism
unity
body
politic
concord
love
together
Hobbes
Leviathan
 | To take a dose of LSD is all right, and you will have the experience of being more or less crazy, but this will make quite good sense because you know you took the dose of LSD. If, on the other hand, you took the LSD by accident, and then find yourself going crazy, not knowing how you got there, this is a terrifying and horrible experience. This is a much more serious and terrible experience, very different from the trip which you can enjoy if you know you took the LSD.
Now consider the difference between my generation and you who are under twenty-five. We all live in the same crazy universe whose hate, distrust, and hypocrisy relates back (especially at the international level)’ to the Fourteen Points and the Treaty of Versailles.
We older ones know how we got here. I can remember my father reading the Fourteen Points at the breakfast table and saying, “By golly, they’re going to give them a decent armistice, a decent peace,” or something of the kind. And I can remember, but I will not attempt to verbalize, the sort of thing he said when the Treaty of Versailles came out. It wasn’t printable. So I know more or less how we got here.
But from your point of view, we are absolutely crazy, and you don’t know what sort of historic event led to this craziness. “The fathers have eaten bitter fruit and the children’s teeth are set on edge.” It’s all very well for the fathers, they know what they ate. The children don’t know what was eaten. |
✖ Via Steps to an Ecology of Mind by Gregory Bateson, University of Chicago Press, [1972]2000, p. 481 [Google books preview] Think midle eastern wars, energy crisis, Europe financial crisis, unexplainable killing sprees and so forth. Previously on Skandalon |
• May 25, 2010 link notes tagged:
communication
technology
media
ecology
cybernetic
deception
despair
lost
confusion
generation
history
context
politic
economy
energy
war
destruction
murder
killing spree
 | Do the “Iraqi weapons of mass destruction” not fit perfectly the status of the MacGuffin? (Incidentally, one of the most famous Hitchcockian MacGuffins IS a potential weapon of mass destruction - the bottles with “radioactive diamonds” in Notorious!) Are they not also an elusive entity, never empirically specified - when, a couple of years ago, the UN inspectors were searching for them in Iraq, they were expected to be hidden in the most disparate and improbable places, from the (rather logical place of) desert to the (slightly irrational) cellars of the presidential palaces (so that, when the palace is bombed, they may poison Saddam and his entire entourage?), allegedly present in large quantities, yet magically moved around all the time by the hands of workers, and the more all-present and all-powerful in their threat, the more they are destroyed, as if the distraction of the greater part of them magically heightens the destructive power of the remainder? As such, they by definition cannot ever be found, and are therefore all the more dangerous… Now that none were found, we reached the last line of the story of MacGuffin: “‘Well,’ said President Bush in September 2003, ‘then that’s not a MacGuffin, is it?’ |
✖ Via “The Iraqi MacGuffin” by Slavoj Zizek, Nov. 4th, 2003 |
• May 18, 2010 link notes tagged:
art
politic
Iraq
WMD
simulacrum
Baudrillard
Zizek
philosophy
representation
movie
cinema
film
plot
media
technology
war
critic