I have watched and read your reviews for years with great honor. I disagree so strongly with your review of “Eat Pray Love” that it makes me sick. You just don’t get it, and many others like you don’t get it. You do not know at all what it is like being a woman in this day and age (or previously) who did not want to be defined by a man or married off to one. If you think Stephen in the movie was an OK husband, you are out to lunch. He was horrible!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (except on paper to people who do not need emotional sustenance). David was the narcissist from hell that many of us have fallen for… do you not get that??????????? Many of the males of the species are frankly overrated and the women’s movement has proven this (or frankly not sufficiently). I hope your wife will bring you up to speed. (Jeanine Carlson, Ph.D., Licensed Clinical Psychologist)
✖ Via Roger Ebert.com: “You do not get that???????” by Roger Ebert, August 18, 2010

The quote is from a woman complaining to Roger Ebert about his review of Eat, Pray, Love. Somehow, I found interesting the fact that she’s a “Licensed Clinical Psychologist”.



• Aug 20, 2010 link notes tagged: art  movie  film  Ebert  critic  review  psychology  woman  women  humor  license  wife  pathology  anxiety  rage  frustration 

I don’t know if you’re a detective or a pervert.
✖ Via Blue Velvet, David Lynch, 1986

Full script over at the Internet Movie Script Database (IMSDb)



• Jul 14, 2010 link notes tagged: art  movie  film  research  academia  detective  pervert  lost  representation  pathology  psychology 

Cognitive dissonance is an uncomfortable feeling caused by holding two contradictory ideas simultaneously. The theory of cognitive dissonance proposes that people have a motivational drive to reduce dissonance by changing their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors, or by justifying or rationalizing them. It is one of the most influential and extensively studied theories in social psychology. […] The most famous case in the early study of cognitive dissonance was described by Leon Festinger and others in the book When Prophecy Fails. The authors infiltrated a group that was expecting the imminent end of the world on a certain date. When that prediction failed, the movement did not disintegrate, but grew instead, as members vied to prove their orthodoxy by recruiting converts.
✖ Via Wikipedia: “Cognitive dissonance”

Learn more about Leon Festinger and his famous book When Prophecy Fails



• May 07, 2010 link notes tagged: science  psychology  cognition  reality  faith  beliefs  prophecy  order  chaos  study 

Milgram found that 62.5% of his subjects could be encouraged, browbeaten or intimidated into seeing the test through to its conclusion by delivering scores of shocks of increasing intensity to the maximum of 450 volts. In Game of Death, 81% of contestants went all the way by administering more than 20 shocks up to a maximum of 460 volts. Only 16 of the 80 subjects recruited for the fake game show refused the verbal prodding from the host — and pressure from the audience to keep dishing out the torture like a good sport — though most expressed misgivings or tried to pull out before being convinced otherwise.
✖ Via Time: “Game of Death: France’s Shocking TV Experiment” by Bruce Crumley, March 17, 2010

Learn more about the “Milgram experiment” on Wikipedia.



• Mar 18, 2010 link notes tagged: communication  technology  television  vilence  torture  psychology  ecperiment  empathy  pain  autority  reality show  reality TV  game  play 

Perhaps a thorough investigation will reveal the “real” reasons for the murders. Perhaps Amy Bishop is mentally ill, or perhaps she is, quite simply, evil.
✖ Via National Review Online: “Don’t Over-Generalize From the Huntsville Murders” by David French, Feb. 18, 2010

David French starts by arguing against what he believes to be an overstatement published in a post on the Chronicle of Higher Education website:

“Academic life as a “petri dish for madness”? We may have a winner for overstatement of the year. At this point, we don’t even know if Amy Bishop was mentally ill. Nor do we know if academic life had anything to do with her killing spree.”

On one hand, French is right : to suggest that academic life alone can explain Bishop’s behavior is to give way to much importance over this single factor while ignoring others. Though it’s true there has been at least one other similar incident (Valery Fabrikant) one needs to take into account multiple factors when trying to understand Bishop’s behavior (she killed here brother in 1986, was charged with assault on another woman in 2002, etc.)

On the other hand, while French condemns what he sees as the “overstatement of the year”, he goes on suggesting that Bishop is perhaps quite simply evil… Looks like a self-contradictory argument.

More importantly, it’s emblematic of what Dana L. Cloud calls a “therapeutic discourse” that is the “dislocation of social problems into a private, familial or psychological frame”. “Such discourse”, adds Cloud “emphasizes individual responsability for and the necessity of private rather than societal response to social problems.” (“Deranged Loners and Demented Outsiders? Therapeutic News Frames of Presidential Assassination Attempts, 1973–2001” by Kristen E. Hoerl, Dana L. Cloud & Sharon E. Jarvis, Communication, Culture & Critique, vol. 2, no 1, p. 84, March 2009).

Dana L. Cloud’s book Control and Consolation in American Politics and Culture: Rhetorics of Therapy (London, Thousand Oaks: Sage Press, 1998) is available online free of charge.



• Feb 22, 2010 link notes tagged: communication  critic  murder  murderer  therapeutic  psychology  individual  society  death  destruction  analysis  study  rhetoric 
art technology medicine science psychology psychiatry madness mad woman painting painter
✖ Via L’Histoire par l’image: “Pinel Liberating the Madwomen of the Salpêtrière” by Tony Robert-Fleury [Hi-Res]

“Charcot worked under the aegis of Fleury’s painting, which exhibits, in the foreground, the fetters and tools that tell the tale of the enchaining of the madwomen and their ‘liberation’ by Pinel; what is depicted is the turning point, or rather the decisive chiasmus, which Pinel is said to have effected in the mythology of madness. This chiasmus was, in the first place, the concept of madness that Hegel formulated, declaring himself wholly indebted to Pinel; madness was not supposed to be an abstract loss of reason, but a simple disorder, ‘a simple contradiction within reason’. This means that, in principle, a madwoman should be supposed, or presupposed, writes Hegel, to be quite simply a reasonable being.” (Invention of Hysteria. Charcot and the Photographic Iconography of the Salpêtrière by Georges Didi-Huberman, tr. by Alisa Hartz, The MIT Press, [1982]2003, p. 4)

Wikipedia entries for Tony Robert-Fleury and Philippe Pinel



• Jan 03, 2010 link notes tagged: art  technology  medicine  science  psychology  psychiatry  madness  mad  woman  painting  painter 

skandalon


1 2



ARCHIVE / TUMBLTAPE / RSS / CONTACT / Theme based on D&D