 | Our purpose is to find out whether innocence, the moment it becomes involved in action, can avoid committing murder. We can only act in terms of our own time, among the people who surround us. We shall know nothing until we know whether we have the right to kill our fellow men, or the right to let them be killed. In that every action today leads to murder, direct or indirect, we cannot act until we know whether or why we have the right to kill. |
✖ Via The Rebel. An Essay on Man in Revolt by Albert Camus, tr. by Anthony Bower, “Introduction” (L’Homme révolté, Gallimard, Paris, 1951, p. 14). An electronic version of this English translation can be found over at Radical eBook Archive (along with many others). |
• Aug 30, 2010 link notes tagged:
art
book
essay
author
philosophy
modernity
revolution
murder
innocence
Camus
 |
Unlike, say, her performance at the Grammys, which was a perfect fusion of spectacle (a nine-months-pregnant woman rapping in a see-through dress) with content (Maya’s fervor was linked to the music), the video for “Born Free” feels exploitative and hollow. Seemingly designed to be banned on YouTube, which it was instantly, the video is set in Los Angeles where a vague but apparently American militia forcibly search out red-headed men and one particularly beautiful red-headed child. The gingers, as Maya called them, using British slang, are taken to the desert, where they are beaten and killed. The first to die is the child, who is shot in the head. While “Born Free” is heard in the background throughout, the song is lost in the carnage. As a meditation on prejudice and senseless persecution, the video is, at best, politically naïve.
“The video was more than fine with me,” Jimmy Iovine told me later that night. Despite Maya’s efforts, he had seen it. “I didn’t even have a blink.” A canny showman, Iovine knew that the video would get attention, that Maya would get her visa (which she did) and that all the noise was good for business. He has a long history of driving record sales with violent imagery: in the 1990s, Interscope was home to Death Row Records, where Snoop Dogg, Dr. Dre and Tupac Shakur made millions rapping about all things gangsta. Iovine also appreciates the outrageous: Interscope’s biggest artist is Lady Gaga, who has melded big-time theatricality with disco-based pop, a kind of love child of Elton John and Madonna. |
✖ Via The New York Times: “M.I.A.’s Agitprop Pop” by Lynn Hirschberg, May 25th, 2010 Excellent article by Lynn Hirschberg and a great follow up on the “Born Free” music video controversy. [UPDATE - August 16th, 2010] Apparently, M.I.A. didn’t like the article by Lynn Hirschberg: MIA is upset about a New York Times Magazine cover story about her, so she tweeted the phone number of the piece’s writer, Lynn Hirschberg.
“917.834.3158 CALL ME IF YOU WANNA TALK TO ME ABOUT THE N Y T TRUTH ISSUE, ill b taking calls all day bitches ;)” she wrote.
Because MIA presented the number as her own, Hirschberg has been deluged with calls from fans wanting to hook up with MIA. (The Huffington Post: “M.I.A. Freaks Out At ‘New York Times,’ Tweets Reporter’s Phone Number”, June 2, 2010) |
• Jun 08, 2010 link notes tagged:
art
video
music
pop
culture
mainstream
entertainment
industry
consumption
critic
integration
representation
revolution
simulacrum
loser
lost
violence
contradiction
controversy
media
 | You know what capitalism produces. According to Marx and Engels.”
“Its own grave-diggers,” he said.
“But these are not grave-diggers. This is the free market itself. These people are the fantasy generated by the market. They don’t exist outside the market. There is nowhere they can go to be on the outside. There is no outside. |
✖ Via Cosmopolis by Don DeLillo, New York: Sribner, 2003, p. 90 Previously on Skandalon: Don DeLillo |
• Apr 25, 2010 link notes tagged:
DeLillo
Marx
art
author
book
capitalism
critic
integration
market
novel
resistance
revolution
Cosmopolis
 |
Joseph Stack had barely finished flying his airplane into a Texas office building when the battle over his legacy began.
Bloggers on the left asked why people — especially people on the right — weren’t calling him a terrorist. “If this had been done by a brownish-looking Muslim guy whose suicide note paralleled Islamist political themes,” wrote Matthew Yglesias, then right wingers would be “demanding that anyone who refused to label the attack ‘terrorism’ be put up on treason charges.”
Bloggers on the right, such as Conn Carroll, asked why people — especially people on the left — were acting as if Stack was a “conservative Tea Party nut” when the anti-tax animus that led him to point his plane at I.R.S. offices was only one part of an eclectic ideology.
These are arguments worth having, for two reasons. |
✖ Via The New York Times: “The First Tea-Party Terrorist?” by Robert Wright, Feb. 23, 2010 About Robert Wright : “Robert Wright, a senior fellow at the New America Foundation, writes every Wednesday about culture, politics and world affairs. He is editor-in-chief of Bloggingheads.tv and The Progressive Realist. He is the author of The Moral Animal, Nonzero, and, most recently, The New York Times best-seller The Evolution of God. He has written for The Atlantic, The New Yorker, Time, Slate, and many other magazines and has taught philosophy at Princeton and religion at the University of Pennsylvania.” (more) |
• Mar 04, 2010 link notes tagged:
communication
technology
critic
revolution
terror
terrorism
destruction
politic
society
plane crash